bell hooks, "ethnographic gaze", "an outsider looking in", "does not oppose the way hegemonic whiteness 'represents' blackness but rather assumes an imperial overseeing position that is in no way progressive or counterhegemonic." Judith Butler, "camera itself is empowered as phallic instrument", "the vehicle through which the transubstantiation occurs", "an instrument and effect of lesbian desire", "to enter into a logic of fetishization which installs the ambivalence of that 'performance" as related to our own." 但说实话自己观影时没觉得这部的gaze有多problematic/patronizing家庭重组在线观看可能因为我本身就是一个凝视这个群体的外人
这一部独立成篇没有第一部那种完美相但是放在三部曲里面分量可能比第一部还要重两代教父的成长史齐头并进如果已经看了第三部知道两个人的最终命运那这一部真是每一个细节都是命运留下的注脚这两个人身为父子身上有很多一脉相承的东西聪明果断重情义恩怨分明;但是两个人从出身到性格到经历到所处的时代都决定了两代教父完全不同的命运Times are changing是事实家庭重组在线观看也是借口事实是一代教父的辉煌确实是时代造就的借口是回到同样的时代二代教父也不大可能有同样的圆满命运啊在每个人生节点都埋下了伏笔再多的挣扎亦是徒劳